Every AI session transcript behind Eleven, published whole, secrets redacted. If an AI vendor can see it, you should be able to see it too.
π€ Eleven is largely built with AI, and this is the provenance record. Each entry below is a complete Claude Code session transcript β the prompts, the model's replies, and the commands it ran. Credentials are the only thing removed: every secret, token, key, and the private ops runbook are redacted in place, and every redaction is annotated with why (legend below).
π€ Today this covers Paul's own sessions, published by his choice. The intent is that every contribution built with AI includes its prompt transcript β that becomes a requirement for all contributors only once agreed with them, not by surprise.
π€ Contributors also keep a small personal redaction budget: a handful of things anyone may remove for personal reasons, no justification owed. Those show as redacted: personal and are counted in the open like every other redaction β the published count is what keeps the budget honest.
π€ Sessions are in the ledger by default β opting in is what contributing means here β but a whole session can be withheld (it stays on the record below: date, prompt count, and a reason, with the content withheld) or, in the rarest cases, omitted with only the aggregate count published. Withholding is for what redaction can't fix: where sharing would cause or attract harm to a person, would reveal secrets whose exposure could cause harm (including national security), or would carry consequences beyond revealing the human's intent β the thing transparency is for. One case is mandatory, not optional: any session whose content could compromise the security of the centralised services (the push relay, home, cloud and billing, connect, the router) is withheld whole, because a credential can be redacted but a narrative that maps the defences cannot.
| Who | Model | Summary |
|---|